Talk:Power Set Proliferation: Difference between revisions
imported>GuyPerfect m (Notes on Revamp) |
imported>Aggelakis (→Revamp Part 2: suggest removing "possible prolifs") |
||
| Line 11: | Line 11: | ||
== Revamp Part 2 == | == Revamp Part 2 == | ||
I've revamped the article to clean up the presentation a bit. The "future possibilities" part is retained minus the rampant parenthetical speculation, though I didn't add the information about Dr. Brainstorm and his shennanigans. I like the way the article functions currently, so adding the story side of things would be a welcome addition. --[[User:GuyPerfect|GuyPerfect]] 23:05, 17 July 2009 (UTC) | I've revamped the article to clean up the presentation a bit. The "future possibilities" part is retained minus the rampant parenthetical speculation, though I didn't add the information about Dr. Brainstorm and his shennanigans. I like the way the article functions currently, so adding the story side of things would be a welcome addition. --[[User:GuyPerfect|GuyPerfect]] 23:05, 17 July 2009 (UTC) | ||
:Question - why do we even have the possible future proliferations at all? All of that is speculation without a drop of proof and doesn't belong here. -- -- [[User:Aggelakis|Agge]] <sub>([[User_talk:Aggelakis|talk]])</sub> 16:42, 26 July 2009 (UTC) | |||
Revision as of 16:42, 26 July 2009
Future Possibilities
Should these be here? Back on Issue 13's Talk page, we were told to remove speculation from that article, unless there was some type of souce. SaintNicster 19:25, 17 July 2009 (UTC)
Well, I wouldn't mind shortening it down. I could consolidate a lot of space by removing the input by some of the sets. If you really feel it should be done, I have no problem putting time in to do it. Bluebeetle27 20:21, 17 July 2009 (UTC)
Revamp
At the moment, the article looks like one of the definition pages. Should this page be revamped with the instory background Dr. Brainstorm and his Resonance Manipulator device being the one responsible for powerset proliferation in a similiar manner to Mission Architect and Architect Entertainment? Sera404 22:07, 17 July 2009 (UTC)
- That sounds like a better plan. SaintNicster 22:57, 17 July 2009 (UTC)
Revamp Part 2
I've revamped the article to clean up the presentation a bit. The "future possibilities" part is retained minus the rampant parenthetical speculation, though I didn't add the information about Dr. Brainstorm and his shennanigans. I like the way the article functions currently, so adding the story side of things would be a welcome addition. --GuyPerfect 23:05, 17 July 2009 (UTC)