Talk:Ajax: Difference between revisions
imported>Felderburg No edit summary |
imported>Felderburg No edit summary |
||
(5 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown) | |||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
==Spoilers== | |||
Don't we want to hide the spoilers? I notice that twice the spoilers hidden template has been removed. People might stumble across this info and read it if they're not careful. Forcing them to click is better, isn't it? | Don't we want to hide the spoilers? I notice that twice the spoilers hidden template has been removed. People might stumble across this info and read it if they're not careful. Forcing them to click is better, isn't it? | ||
Line 9: | Line 11: | ||
:The whole wiki is a giant spoiler. The {{tl|spoiler}} template was created so that people can skip the spoiler bits by seeing that flag and going to the next chunk of text instead of reading the next paragraph. There is also {{tl|endspoiler}}, if the spoiler text is more than a paragraph. ~ {{:User:Aggelakis/Sig1}} 05:43, 1 May 2010 (UTC) | :The whole wiki is a giant spoiler. The {{tl|spoiler}} template was created so that people can skip the spoiler bits by seeing that flag and going to the next chunk of text instead of reading the next paragraph. There is also {{tl|endspoiler}}, if the spoiler text is more than a paragraph. ~ {{:User:Aggelakis/Sig1}} 05:43, 1 May 2010 (UTC) | ||
::Fair enough, I guess. I just copied the format from the Nemesis page (which I noticed you also changed). I still think that we ought to guard people from their own roving eyes, but you're the more experienced editor. | ::Fair enough, I guess. I just copied the format from the Nemesis page (which I noticed you also changed). I still think that we ought to guard people from their own roving eyes, but you're the more experienced editor. [[User:Felderburg|Felderburg]] 05:49, 1 May 2010 (UTC) | ||
==Helmet?== | |||
Anyone know what happened to the helmet his letter talks about? Are we assuming he ditched it once the truth was revealed? [[User:Felderburg|Felderburg]] 23:14, 4 May 2010 (UTC) | |||
==Affiliation== | |||
Right now I have Wyvern. However, his villain group in game is "Rogue Hero". I suspect we'll be seeing more of those as time goes on... I hesitate to put anything though, since he was a hero who went rogue, which would theoretically make him a vigilante (which was his affiliation before). I suppose we could put "vigilante" and link to the vigilante alignment, or we could wait, and see if more rogues/vigilantes pop up in game after GR hits, and make articles on them/make them a category. [[User:Felderburg|Felderburg]] 05:22, 5 May 2010 (UTC) |
Latest revision as of 05:22, 5 May 2010
Spoilers
Don't we want to hide the spoilers? I notice that twice the spoilers hidden template has been removed. People might stumble across this info and read it if they're not careful. Forcing them to click is better, isn't it?
Felderburg 05:32, 1 May 2010 (UTC)
I ooked at the history, you say "no need for both." If you just hide the spoiler, without the template, it's a boring thing that just says "Spoiler" and click to show. I still think they ought to be hidden, but the "Spoiler warning...." should be there too. I mean, with Ajax they're minor spoilers, but still.
Felderburg 05:40, 1 May 2010 (UTC)
- The whole wiki is a giant spoiler. The {{spoiler}} template was created so that people can skip the spoiler bits by seeing that flag and going to the next chunk of text instead of reading the next paragraph. There is also {{endspoiler}}, if the spoiler text is more than a paragraph. ~ User:Aggelakis/Sig1 05:43, 1 May 2010 (UTC)
- Fair enough, I guess. I just copied the format from the Nemesis page (which I noticed you also changed). I still think that we ought to guard people from their own roving eyes, but you're the more experienced editor. Felderburg 05:49, 1 May 2010 (UTC)
Helmet?
Anyone know what happened to the helmet his letter talks about? Are we assuming he ditched it once the truth was revealed? Felderburg 23:14, 4 May 2010 (UTC)
Affiliation
Right now I have Wyvern. However, his villain group in game is "Rogue Hero". I suspect we'll be seeing more of those as time goes on... I hesitate to put anything though, since he was a hero who went rogue, which would theoretically make him a vigilante (which was his affiliation before). I suppose we could put "vigilante" and link to the vigilante alignment, or we could wait, and see if more rogues/vigilantes pop up in game after GR hits, and make articles on them/make them a category. Felderburg 05:22, 5 May 2010 (UTC)