Talk:Issue 14: Difference between revisions
imported>Sera404 No edit summary |
imported>Aggelakis |
||
| (3 intermediate revisions by 3 users not shown) | |||
| Line 12: | Line 12: | ||
* There's also [http://www.badge-hunter.com/dev_search.php Vidiot's search], but I can't find it there, either [[User:SaintNicster|SaintNicster]] 04:05, 24 March 2009 (UTC) | * There's also [http://www.badge-hunter.com/dev_search.php Vidiot's search], but I can't find it there, either [[User:SaintNicster|SaintNicster]] 04:05, 24 March 2009 (UTC) | ||
:Oooh, I remember that when I made the article [[Buttcape]]. The article did have links, but since the posts got purged, the links in the article got removed. [[User:Sera404|Sera404]] 04:16, 24 March 2009 (UTC) | :Oooh, I remember that when I made the article [[Buttcape]]. The article did have links, but since the posts got purged, the links in the article got removed. I ''think'', BackAlleyBrawler responded with: | ||
::Dear jerks, | |||
::Where da hell are my buttcapes? | |||
:Responses to that post was pretty funny. :D [[User:Sera404|Sera404]] 04:16, 24 March 2009 (UTC) | |||
:I put it in deliberately. I'll believe we're getting buttcapes when I see it. - [[User:Baalus Seth|Baalus Seth]] 18:24, 24 March 2009 (UTC) | |||
== Freespec == | |||
The article seems to be striving for comprehensive coverage of all things related to the I14 release. The loader teaser-text mentioned that there will be a freespec issued when I14 goes live (apparently 08-APR-09) and suggests players to use any freespecs up beforehand if they desire because they do not stack. Is the freespec issuance important enough to mention in the I14 article? | |||
Just mentioning it here in case someone feels it warrants documentation for posterity's sake LOL. --[[User:Chiaki|Chiaki]] 04:54, 7 April 2009 (UTC) | |||
:Freespecs aren't generally included as part of the issue notes, though of course I'm not averse to someone adding a small notation. Previous issues with freespecs served with or soon after haven't had their freespecs noted. -- [[User:Aggelakis|Agge]] ([[User_talk:Aggelakis|talk]]) 07:21, 7 April 2009 (UTC) | |||
Latest revision as of 07:21, 7 April 2009
Valkyrie Dual blades can be seen in the costume creater on test. Not NDA covered and confirmed.Catwhoorg 17:50, 17 February 2009 (UTC)
OPEN BETA
Does this mean we can start putting in new information relevant to Issue 14? Sera404 00:40, 18 March 2009 (UTC)
Jerk
Regarding why I reinstated the "jerk" bit:
There was a thread where people were, once again, asking about the inclusion of the buttcape. JLove responded with something like, "Someone should write those jerks a letter." BackAlleyBrawler responded to JLove with something like, "Yeah, those jerks."
However, I can't find the thread on the forums and it's not showing up in redtomax's digest archive thingy. Anyone got links? -- Agge (talk) 03:19, 24 March 2009 (UTC)
- There's also Vidiot's search, but I can't find it there, either SaintNicster 04:05, 24 March 2009 (UTC)
- Oooh, I remember that when I made the article Buttcape. The article did have links, but since the posts got purged, the links in the article got removed. I think, BackAlleyBrawler responded with:
- Dear jerks,
- Where da hell are my buttcapes?
- Responses to that post was pretty funny. :D Sera404 04:16, 24 March 2009 (UTC)
- I put it in deliberately. I'll believe we're getting buttcapes when I see it. - Baalus Seth 18:24, 24 March 2009 (UTC)
Freespec
The article seems to be striving for comprehensive coverage of all things related to the I14 release. The loader teaser-text mentioned that there will be a freespec issued when I14 goes live (apparently 08-APR-09) and suggests players to use any freespecs up beforehand if they desire because they do not stack. Is the freespec issuance important enough to mention in the I14 article?
Just mentioning it here in case someone feels it warrants documentation for posterity's sake LOL. --Chiaki 04:54, 7 April 2009 (UTC)