Talk:Retroactive Continuity: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
imported>Ravenswing No edit summary |
imported>Sleepykitty No edit summary |
||
| Line 4: | Line 4: | ||
The only actual retcon mentioned there is the Spider to Arachnos one. The 5th Column were taken over by the Council, not retroactively deleted. Indeed, they still exist. I think this page needs a big overhaul. - [[User:Ravenswing]] | The only actual retcon mentioned there is the Spider to Arachnos one. The 5th Column were taken over by the Council, not retroactively deleted. Indeed, they still exist. I think this page needs a big overhaul. - [[User:Ravenswing]] | ||
:o.o they where 'taken over', but in doing so, all the story arcs involving them where retconned. Also, things mentioning them where retconned as well for quite awhile in game. In many ways, the 5th to council change was a textbook example of [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Retcon retconning]. --[[User:Sleepykitty|Sleepykitty]] 22:12, 14 December 2008 (UTC) | |||
Revision as of 22:12, 14 December 2008
Improved Monstrosities
Retcons usually have to do with the story, not mechanics of a class of NPCs changing... should this be kept? -- Agge (talk) 17:34, 14 December 2008 (UTC)
The only actual retcon mentioned there is the Spider to Arachnos one. The 5th Column were taken over by the Council, not retroactively deleted. Indeed, they still exist. I think this page needs a big overhaul. - User:Ravenswing
- o.o they where 'taken over', but in doing so, all the story arcs involving them where retconned. Also, things mentioning them where retconned as well for quite awhile in game. In many ways, the 5th to council change was a textbook example of retconning. --Sleepykitty 22:12, 14 December 2008 (UTC)