Template talk:IncarnateListCommonComponent: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
imported>Eabrace mNo edit summary |
imported>Sekoia m (suppressing link to obsolete template) |
||
| (4 intermediate revisions by 3 users not shown) | |||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
Since Shards are common components and are used in other common components, I added {{ | Since Shards are common components and are used in other common components, I added <nowiki>{{IncarnateListCommonComponentB}}</nowiki> to the template in order to list those other common components appropriately. However, now on the other component pages (e.g. [[Ancient Nictus Fragment Component]]), Shards are listed as Used In, with a redlink to a dpl call. I can't find anything in these templates to fix that error. ~ {{:User:Aggelakis/Sig1}} 00:16, 17 December 2010 (UTC) | ||
:I think I've seen something similar to that before when tinkering with DPL calls. Seems there's a default template missing somewhere. --[[User:Eabrace|Eabrace]] [[File:Healthbar notify phone.png|20px|link=User talk:Eabrace]] 00:30, 17 December 2010 (UTC) | :I think I've seen something similar to that before when tinkering with DPL calls. Seems there's a default template missing somewhere. --[[User:Eabrace|Eabrace]] [[File:Healthbar notify phone.png|20px|link=User talk:Eabrace]] 00:30, 17 December 2010 (UTC) | ||
::And I think I fixed it. :) --[[User:Eabrace|Eabrace]] [[File:Healthbar notify phone.png|20px|link=User talk:Eabrace]] 01:03, 17 December 2010 (UTC) | |||
:::Well, you fixed the redlink call, thanks! But you didn't fix the fact that the other common components are listed as "Used In" the creation of Incarnate Shard components -- which they're not (see the Used In section of [[Ancient Nictus Fragment Component]], which is definitely not used in the creation of an Incarnate Shard, since shards are the very base component). That's the more important one that I'm trying to hunt down. I don't understand the code well enough to debug that one. :/ ~ {{:User:Aggelakis/Sig1}} 06:39, 17 December 2010 (UTC) | |||
:::: It's enough to make your head spin, isn't it? I ''think'' I fixed both. For the default, usually those should yield blank because (I think) it's indicating that the template wasn't in use. And that actually is the underlying problem for the larger issue, too; we don't ''want'' the pages that aren't using that template, so it had to exclude them. So... I think I have it working now, but I won't swear to it. -- [[User:Sekoia|Sekoia]] 08:54, 17 December 2010 (UTC) | |||
:::::Well, I don't know if it's how it's supposed to be done :) but all of the pages look like their output is correct. Thanks! ~ {{:User:Aggelakis/Sig1}} 14:26, 17 December 2010 (UTC) | |||
Latest revision as of 09:29, 16 January 2012
Since Shards are common components and are used in other common components, I added {{IncarnateListCommonComponentB}} to the template in order to list those other common components appropriately. However, now on the other component pages (e.g. Ancient Nictus Fragment Component), Shards are listed as Used In, with a redlink to a dpl call. I can't find anything in these templates to fix that error. ~ User:Aggelakis/Sig1 00:16, 17 December 2010 (UTC)
- I think I've seen something similar to that before when tinkering with DPL calls. Seems there's a default template missing somewhere. --Eabrace
00:30, 17 December 2010 (UTC)
- And I think I fixed it. :) --Eabrace 01:03, 17 December 2010 (UTC)
- And I think I fixed it. :) --Eabrace
- Well, you fixed the redlink call, thanks! But you didn't fix the fact that the other common components are listed as "Used In" the creation of Incarnate Shard components -- which they're not (see the Used In section of Ancient Nictus Fragment Component, which is definitely not used in the creation of an Incarnate Shard, since shards are the very base component). That's the more important one that I'm trying to hunt down. I don't understand the code well enough to debug that one. :/ ~ User:Aggelakis/Sig1 06:39, 17 December 2010 (UTC)
- It's enough to make your head spin, isn't it? I think I fixed both. For the default, usually those should yield blank because (I think) it's indicating that the template wasn't in use. And that actually is the underlying problem for the larger issue, too; we don't want the pages that aren't using that template, so it had to exclude them. So... I think I have it working now, but I won't swear to it. -- Sekoia 08:54, 17 December 2010 (UTC)
- Well, I don't know if it's how it's supposed to be done :) but all of the pages look like their output is correct. Thanks! ~ User:Aggelakis/Sig1 14:26, 17 December 2010 (UTC)