Template talk:Navbox Pet Commands: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
imported>Konoko No edit summary |
imported>Sekoia (→To detail or not to detail: no detail) |
||
| Line 44: | Line 44: | ||
:Detailed +1 -- [[User:Aggelakis|Agge]] ([[User_talk:Aggelakis|talk]]) 04:41, 9 December 2008 (UTC) | :Detailed +1 -- [[User:Aggelakis|Agge]] ([[User_talk:Aggelakis|talk]]) 04:41, 9 December 2008 (UTC) | ||
: Alrighty. Detailed it is. -[[User:Konoko|Konoko]] | : Alrighty. Detailed it is. -[[User:Konoko|Konoko]] | ||
: I'd vote against the detailed version. Navboxes are supposed to be for navigation, not information. The more information that you put in, the less easy it is to use for navigation due to increased clutter. Also, the more bloat it puts on the page. With the parameters, it becomes a mini-reference instead of navigation. -- [[User:Sekoia|Sekoia]] 06:57, 10 December 2008 (UTC) | |||
Revision as of 06:57, 10 December 2008
To detail or not to detail
I personally like having the slash command parameters in the Navbox so that I can see them at a glance. But the parameters add noise that gets distracting and is hard to find a command at a glance. Which format should we use for the slash command navbox templates? --Konoko 23:39, 8 December 2008 (UTC)
- I'd have to say I like the more detailed one, myself. The links make it relatively easy to pick out each command. Just my two cents. --Eabrace 00:44, 9 December 2008 (UTC)
- Detailed +1 -- Agge (talk) 04:41, 9 December 2008 (UTC)
- Alrighty. Detailed it is. -Konoko
- I'd vote against the detailed version. Navboxes are supposed to be for navigation, not information. The more information that you put in, the less easy it is to use for navigation due to increased clutter. Also, the more bloat it puts on the page. With the parameters, it becomes a mini-reference instead of navigation. -- Sekoia 06:57, 10 December 2008 (UTC)