Template talk:PMarket Power Set: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
imported>Taosin (request expansion to cater for yet-to-be-released) |
imported>Thirty7 No edit summary |
||
| Line 4: | Line 4: | ||
* cost=u - Paragon Points cost will be known when this power set is released | * cost=u - Paragon Points cost will be known when this power set is released | ||
...or meaning/words to this effect?[[User:Taosin|Taosin]] 11:25, 23 June 2012 (UTC) | ...or meaning/words to this effect?[[User:Taosin|Taosin]] 11:25, 23 June 2012 (UTC) | ||
:I have implemented similar parameters... for the most part. I simply altered the default value on cost, so now, if you don't enter one, it spits out a generic statement about buying it, but not for how much. I added a '?' parameter for the vip variable so that it can be clearly stated that we simply aren't sure yet. I really think it is best to avoid ambiguity and assumptions as much as we can. When we do know for sure, it is a simple change. I also went through and added a cost to all of the uses of the template that formerly made use of the old '800' default. {{smile}} If anyone is strongly opposed, as always, revert stuff and I can argue with you later. {{tongue}} {{User:Thirty7/Sig}} 12:24, 23 June 2012 (UTC) | |||
Revision as of 12:24, 23 June 2012
More options for usage?
is it possible to add:
- vip=u - it is not known yet if VIP players will need to purchase
- cost=u - Paragon Points cost will be known when this power set is released
...or meaning/words to this effect?Taosin 11:25, 23 June 2012 (UTC)
- I have implemented similar parameters... for the most part. I simply altered the default value on cost, so now, if you don't enter one, it spits out a generic statement about buying it, but not for how much. I added a '?' parameter for the vip variable so that it can be clearly stated that we simply aren't sure yet. I really think it is best to avoid ambiguity and assumptions as much as we can. When we do know for sure, it is a simple change. I also went through and added a cost to all of the uses of the template that formerly made use of the old '800' default.
If anyone is strongly opposed, as always, revert stuff and I can argue with you later. 
User:Thirty7/Sig 12:24, 23 June 2012 (UTC)
