Template talk:Stub: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
imported>StarGeek (Stub vs. Wip) |
imported>StarGeek (Added edit link) |
||
| Line 2: | Line 2: | ||
I finally took time to read the [[Template talk:Wip|talk on wip]], followed up by some reading on Wikipedia, and realized that Wip is getting overused on articles that can stand alone, where as it's supposed to be for articles that would make no sense (notes, raw unorganized data, etc). The Wikipedia places stub templates at the bottom of the page, so as not to distract from the reading of the article, since the wiki is supposed to be about the readers, not the editors {{smile}}. --[[User:StarGeek|StarGeek]] 15:39, 1 May 2006 (PDT) | I finally took time to read the [[Template talk:Wip|talk on wip]], followed up by some reading on Wikipedia, and realized that Wip is getting overused on articles that can stand alone, where as it's supposed to be for articles that would make no sense (notes, raw unorganized data, etc). The Wikipedia places stub templates at the bottom of the page, so as not to distract from the reading of the article, since the wiki is supposed to be about the readers, not the editors {{smile}}. --[[User:StarGeek|StarGeek]] 15:39, 1 May 2006 (PDT) | ||
== Added edit link == | |||
I fixed the template so it now has an '''expanding it''' link. The template used in Wikipedia required 1.6 (even though it incorrectly said it required 1.5). --[[User:StarGeek|StarGeek]] 11:55, 7 May 2006 (PDT) | |||
Latest revision as of 18:55, 7 May 2006
Stub vs. Wip
I finally took time to read the talk on wip, followed up by some reading on Wikipedia, and realized that Wip is getting overused on articles that can stand alone, where as it's supposed to be for articles that would make no sense (notes, raw unorganized data, etc). The Wikipedia places stub templates at the bottom of the page, so as not to distract from the reading of the article, since the wiki is supposed to be about the readers, not the editors 
. --StarGeek 15:39, 1 May 2006 (PDT)
Added edit link
I fixed the template so it now has an expanding it link. The template used in Wikipedia required 1.6 (even though it incorrectly said it required 1.5). --StarGeek 11:55, 7 May 2006 (PDT)