Category talk:Bugs: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
imported>Sekoia No edit summary |
imported>Thirty7 No edit summary |
||
| Line 6: | Line 6: | ||
There appears to be a bug on the Bug page causing an error re: ref-tags to appear after the table. I am not sure precisely how best to fix that, so... yeah. —[[User:Thirty7|Thirty7]] [[File:Talk-Icon.jpg|link=User talk:Thirty7]] 04:39, 17 April 2012 (UTC) | There appears to be a bug on the Bug page causing an error re: ref-tags to appear after the table. I am not sure precisely how best to fix that, so... yeah. —[[User:Thirty7|Thirty7]] [[File:Talk-Icon.jpg|link=User talk:Thirty7]] 04:39, 17 April 2012 (UTC) | ||
: I'd say we should just ignore it. If we include the corresponding references tag, we'll end up getting an error when there's no more bugs with refs. The ideal thing to do would be to make sure no bug template calls use citations within them. -- [[User:Sekoia|Sekoia]] 04:41, 17 April 2012 (UTC) | : I'd say we should just ignore it. If we include the corresponding references tag, we'll end up getting an error when there's no more bugs with refs. The ideal thing to do would be to make sure no bug template calls use citations within them. -- [[User:Sekoia|Sekoia]] 04:41, 17 April 2012 (UTC) | ||
::Fixed. I moved the ref tags out of the only two bug templates in which they are used... hopefully to a place where it makes as much sense as possible. Had it been more than just the two places, I'da ignored it, but it seemed easy enough. —[[User:Thirty7|Thirty7]] [[File:Talk-Icon.jpg|link=User talk:Thirty7]] 04:51, 17 April 2012 (UTC) | |||
Latest revision as of 04:51, 17 April 2012
Table is le'borked! -- Aggelakis 20:37, 16 November 2008 (UTC)
- Bork! Bork! Bork!
- For some reason, it didn't like the tablesortcol=1 argument in the DPL call. Seems happier with that removed. --Eabrace 21:11, 16 November 2008 (UTC)
There appears to be a bug on the Bug page causing an error re: ref-tags to appear after the table. I am not sure precisely how best to fix that, so... yeah. —Thirty7 
04:39, 17 April 2012 (UTC)
- I'd say we should just ignore it. If we include the corresponding references tag, we'll end up getting an error when there's no more bugs with refs. The ideal thing to do would be to make sure no bug template calls use citations within them. -- Sekoia 04:41, 17 April 2012 (UTC)
- Fixed. I moved the ref tags out of the only two bug templates in which they are used... hopefully to a place where it makes as much sense as possible. Had it been more than just the two places, I'da ignored it, but it seemed easy enough. —Thirty7 04:51, 17 April 2012 (UTC)
- Fixed. I moved the ref tags out of the only two bug templates in which they are used... hopefully to a place where it makes as much sense as possible. Had it been more than just the two places, I'da ignored it, but it seemed easy enough. —Thirty7