Talk:Arachnos/Fortunatas: Difference between revisions
imported>Aggelakis m (whoops, deleted the original comment during cut/paste) |
imported>Thirty7 m (moved Talk:Fortunatas to Talk:Arachnos/Fortunatas) |
||
(One intermediate revision by one other user not shown) | |||
Line 14: | Line 14: | ||
::-- [[User:Aggelakis|Agge]] ([[User_talk:Aggelakis|talk]]) 17:08, 3 May 2009 (UTC) | ::-- [[User:Aggelakis|Agge]] ([[User_talk:Aggelakis|talk]]) 17:08, 3 May 2009 (UTC) | ||
::: | ::: | ||
:::Whatever it is, it's not working, it's leading to desynchronising. - [[User:Baalus Seth|Baalus Seth]] 17:33, 3 May 2009 (UTC) |
Latest revision as of 12:37, 27 December 2011
Isn't this page reduntant, replaced by Arachnos Widows? - Baalus Seth 06:19, 8 January 2009 (UTC)
- It's an in-progress transition to a different display style. -- Agge (talk) 06:20, 8 January 2009 (UTC)
Fortunata Mental Training
This is odd. While checking powers of Arachnos goons I've run into one of these ladies and checked her powers, as usual. The game says they use Mental Training, but my numbers show me nothing of that. Au contraire, what I'm seeing is that they match perfectly Mind Link, but being ML a PBAOE power, it doesen't match 100% either, so... Anyways my bet is they messed up the powers' names at some point, since Mental Training doesen't even belong to the Fortunatas powerset, being a Widow Teamwork power instead. Fitting Mind Link much better to those numbers, I'll run the risk and will say it's an error of some sort, and I'll rename the power, making this post so any readers can understand what happened here =)
--Yakovlev 14:48, 3 May 2009 (UTC)
Please don't. Just because the PLAYER powers got their names changed sometime in the past, doesn't mean the ENEMY powers fit. The self-defensive power that Fortunatas use is named Mental Training, and it should remain named as such. - Baalus Seth 16:37, 3 May 2009 (UTC)
- Also, this page is redundant compared to Arachnos Widows - Baalus Seth 16:38, 3 May 2009 (UTC)
- I will re-point to my previous comment above:
- It's an in-progress transition to a different display style. -- Agge (talk) 06:20, 8 January 2009 (UTC)
- -- Agge (talk) 17:08, 3 May 2009 (UTC)
- Whatever it is, it's not working, it's leading to desynchronising. - Baalus Seth 17:33, 3 May 2009 (UTC)