Talk:Earth Control: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
imported>Bradbethke |
imported>Eabrace No edit summary |
||
| Line 2: | Line 2: | ||
Looking at Mids, it's showing that the control set pets (i.e. Animate Stone) are able to take the Recharge Intensive Pet IO sets. I haven't played around with my Controller or Dominator IOs in some time, so I don't know if that's correct. Can anyone verify whether or not those new IOs work in these pets? --[[User:Eabrace|Eabrace]] 19:12, 31 December 2008 (UTC) | Looking at Mids, it's showing that the control set pets (i.e. Animate Stone) are able to take the Recharge Intensive Pet IO sets. I haven't played around with my Controller or Dominator IOs in some time, so I don't know if that's correct. Can anyone verify whether or not those new IOs work in these pets? --[[User:Eabrace|Eabrace]] 19:12, 31 December 2008 (UTC) | ||
:Verified (for Earth Control, at least)... Animate Stone does indeed accept the new Recharge Intensive Pets IOs. I'm going to attempt to make the addition to the article. --[[User:Bradbethke|Bradbethke]] 00:51, 3 January 2009 (UTC) | :Verified (for Earth Control, at least)... Animate Stone does indeed accept the new Recharge Intensive Pets IOs. I'm going to attempt to make the addition to the article. --[[User:Bradbethke|Bradbethke]] 00:51, 3 January 2009 (UTC) | ||
::Excellent. Thanks. --[[User:Eabrace|Eabrace]] 03:05, 3 January 2009 (UTC) | |||
Latest revision as of 03:05, 3 January 2009
General Controller/Dominator Pet IO Question
Looking at Mids, it's showing that the control set pets (i.e. Animate Stone) are able to take the Recharge Intensive Pet IO sets. I haven't played around with my Controller or Dominator IOs in some time, so I don't know if that's correct. Can anyone verify whether or not those new IOs work in these pets? --Eabrace 19:12, 31 December 2008 (UTC)
- Verified (for Earth Control, at least)... Animate Stone does indeed accept the new Recharge Intensive Pets IOs. I'm going to attempt to make the addition to the article. --Bradbethke 00:51, 3 January 2009 (UTC)
- Excellent. Thanks. --Eabrace 03:05, 3 January 2009 (UTC)