Talk:PUG: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
imported>Sleepykitty No edit summary |
imported>Sleepykitty No edit summary |
||
| (One intermediate revision by one other user not shown) | |||
| Line 4: | Line 4: | ||
:: pug = dog. dog = eViL!. thus. Pug = [http://www.brianvu.com/uploaded_images/fluffy-774391.jpg EVIL >.<] o.o admit it, what can be more evil than PuGs? --[[User:Sleepykitty|Sleepy Kitty]] 11:36, 26 May 2006 (PDT) | :: pug = dog. dog = eViL!. thus. Pug = [http://www.brianvu.com/uploaded_images/fluffy-774391.jpg EVIL >.<] o.o admit it, what can be more evil than PuGs? --[[User:Sleepykitty|Sleepy Kitty]] 11:36, 26 May 2006 (PDT) | ||
Most of the PUGs I've been in have been really good. Yes, a few have been spectacularly bad, but most aren't. Of course, my definition of a "bad PUG" is probably not the same as most people's. To me, accruing a lot of experience debt does ''not'' a bad PUG make. Some of the most exciting missions and interesting accomplishments I've been on have ended up with everyone in deep, deep debt. | |||
To me, about the only thing that makes a bad PUG is being bored or when there's rude and obnoxious people in it. | |||
--[[User:TonyV|TonyV]] 12:15, 26 May 2006 (PDT) | |||
: ^^ an interesting view, to me, a bad pug is one where you can't belive that the ppl in it are doing what they're doing. To the point of pure idioticy <.< coincidentally, I often stick around those to watch, kinda like ppl will rubberneck a train crash. I'm usually the only one alive when the train wreck happends, which is odd, since I'm a blaster. o.o honestly, where would the game be without bad pugs? then we'd only have the devs to gossip about. --[[User:Sleepykitty|Sleepy Kitty]] 12:18, 26 May 2006 (PDT) | |||
Latest revision as of 19:18, 26 May 2006
>.< bad pug *waps pug with teflon coated pillow* --Sleepy Kitty 09:36, 26 May 2006 (PDT)
- Poor little pug... - Snorii 10:10, 26 May 2006 (PDT)
- pug = dog. dog = eViL!. thus. Pug = EVIL >.< o.o admit it, what can be more evil than PuGs? --Sleepy Kitty 11:36, 26 May 2006 (PDT)
Most of the PUGs I've been in have been really good. Yes, a few have been spectacularly bad, but most aren't. Of course, my definition of a "bad PUG" is probably not the same as most people's. To me, accruing a lot of experience debt does not a bad PUG make. Some of the most exciting missions and interesting accomplishments I've been on have ended up with everyone in deep, deep debt.
To me, about the only thing that makes a bad PUG is being bored or when there's rude and obnoxious people in it.
--TonyV 12:15, 26 May 2006 (PDT)
- ^^ an interesting view, to me, a bad pug is one where you can't belive that the ppl in it are doing what they're doing. To the point of pure idioticy <.< coincidentally, I often stick around those to watch, kinda like ppl will rubberneck a train crash. I'm usually the only one alive when the train wreck happends, which is odd, since I'm a blaster. o.o honestly, where would the game be without bad pugs? then we'd only have the devs to gossip about. --Sleepy Kitty 12:18, 26 May 2006 (PDT)