Talk:Silencer Badge: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
imported>Thirty7 (Incarnate Level revision?) |
imported>Thirty7 |
||
(3 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown) | |||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
== Incarnate Level == | == Incarnate Level == | ||
Guy seems to think that "incarnate level" shouldn't appear on this page. However, I am certain that only KoA that appear in DA missions or the open zone count for this badge, and removing that reference implies (based solely on the text) that any KoA will count... which they don't. I really think his change should be reverted, but didn't want to start an edit war... so... —[[User:Thirty7|Thirty7]] [[File:Talk-Icon.jpg|link=User talk:Thirty7]] 06:39, 16 May 2012 (UTC) | Guy seems to think that "incarnate level" shouldn't appear on this page. However, I am certain that only KoA that appear in DA missions or the open zone count for this badge, and removing that reference implies (based solely on the text) that any KoA will count... which they don't. I really think his change should be reverted, but didn't want to start an edit war... so... —[[User:Thirty7|Thirty7]] [[File:Talk-Icon.jpg|link=User talk:Thirty7]] 06:39, 16 May 2012 (UTC) | ||
: This badge is for the [[Knives of Vengeance|Knives of ''Vengeance'']] (KoV), not the [[Knives of Artemis]] (KoA). I believe KoV are only found in DA content. -- [[User:Sekoia|Sekoia]] 12:13, 16 May 2012 (UTC) | |||
::Well first of all, yes, that was boneheaded of me (Ko'''A''' vs. Ko'''V'''). However, that doesn't mean that they will never appear elsewhere at a lower level... and not count for the badge. Shouldn't we leave the phrasing as it was to remain consistent among the other badge pages? —[[User:Thirty7|Thirty7]] [[File:Talk-Icon.jpg|link=User talk:Thirty7]] 13:09, 16 May 2012 (UTC) | |||
::: Well, we really have no idea whether they'll add KoV at lower levels, nor do we really know for sure that they won't count towards the badge if they do. It's likely, but not definite. At present, it's redundant to qualify them as Incarnate level because they are ''all'' incarnate level. If anything, having that qualifier may confuse people into wondering which KoV ''won't'' qualify, since all of presently them do. I would personally leave it off for now and only add it back in when and if there are KoV added that do not count for the badge. -- [[User:Sekoia|Sekoia]] 00:36, 17 May 2012 (UTC) | |||
::::I suppose that makes sense. —[[User:Thirty7|Thirty7]] [[File:Talk-Icon.jpg|link=User talk:Thirty7]] 01:48, 17 May 2012 (UTC) |
Latest revision as of 01:48, 17 May 2012
Incarnate Level
Guy seems to think that "incarnate level" shouldn't appear on this page. However, I am certain that only KoA that appear in DA missions or the open zone count for this badge, and removing that reference implies (based solely on the text) that any KoA will count... which they don't. I really think his change should be reverted, but didn't want to start an edit war... so... —Thirty7 06:39, 16 May 2012 (UTC)
- This badge is for the Knives of Vengeance (KoV), not the Knives of Artemis (KoA). I believe KoV are only found in DA content. -- Sekoia 12:13, 16 May 2012 (UTC)
- Well first of all, yes, that was boneheaded of me (KoA vs. KoV). However, that doesn't mean that they will never appear elsewhere at a lower level... and not count for the badge. Shouldn't we leave the phrasing as it was to remain consistent among the other badge pages? —Thirty7 13:09, 16 May 2012 (UTC)
- Well, we really have no idea whether they'll add KoV at lower levels, nor do we really know for sure that they won't count towards the badge if they do. It's likely, but not definite. At present, it's redundant to qualify them as Incarnate level because they are all incarnate level. If anything, having that qualifier may confuse people into wondering which KoV won't qualify, since all of presently them do. I would personally leave it off for now and only add it back in when and if there are KoV added that do not count for the badge. -- Sekoia 00:36, 17 May 2012 (UTC)
- I suppose that makes sense. —Thirty7 01:48, 17 May 2012 (UTC)