Talk:Arachnos Agent Day Job Badge: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
imported>Eabrace (General Question on Current Day Job Badge Redirects) |
imported>Eabrace No edit summary |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
== General Question on Current Day Job Badge Redirects == | == General Question on Current Day Job Badge Redirects == | ||
Currently, the "Day Job Badge" articles are all listed as candidates for deletion. In their current state, each of the original articles has been moved to their proper location, leaving behind a redirect. Do we want to delete all of the redirects, or leave them in place in the event that someone already has links in place (i.e. on the official boards) to the old article locations? --[[User:Eabrace|Eabrace]] 17:01, 15 January 2009 (UTC) | Currently, the "Day Job Badge" articles are all listed as candidates for deletion. In their current state, each of the original articles has been moved to their proper location, leaving behind a redirect. Do we want to delete all of the redirects, or leave them in place in the event that someone already has links in place (i.e. on the official boards) to the old article locations? --[[User:Eabrace|Eabrace]] 17:01, 15 January 2009 (UTC) | ||
:Going to go ahead and remove the delete requests from each of the redirects. If there needs to be some discussion, let's talk on the forums. --[[User:Eabrace|Eabrace]] 02:40, 4 February 2009 (UTC) | |||
Latest revision as of 02:40, 4 February 2009
General Question on Current Day Job Badge Redirects
Currently, the "Day Job Badge" articles are all listed as candidates for deletion. In their current state, each of the original articles has been moved to their proper location, leaving behind a redirect. Do we want to delete all of the redirects, or leave them in place in the event that someone already has links in place (i.e. on the official boards) to the old article locations? --Eabrace 17:01, 15 January 2009 (UTC)
- Going to go ahead and remove the delete requests from each of the redirects. If there needs to be some discussion, let's talk on the forums. --Eabrace 02:40, 4 February 2009 (UTC)