Talk:PAX: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
imported>Corebreach No edit summary |
imported>Corebreach m (completely did not read original article :() |
||
| Line 4: | Line 4: | ||
:No prob, just means the article has to be moved to "Pax", and this one made into a redirect. Of course, before we do that, we should try to find out the origin of Pax though. :3 [[User:Sera404|Sera404]] 02:54, 30 December 2009 (UTC) | :No prob, just means the article has to be moved to "Pax", and this one made into a redirect. Of course, before we do that, we should try to find out the origin of Pax though. :3 [[User:Sera404|Sera404]] 02:54, 30 December 2009 (UTC) | ||
Revision as of 01:37, 31 December 2009
Article is "PAX", while the actual article details is "Pax". Which is correct? Sera404 16:14, 29 December 2009 (UTC)
Really sorry Sera, I was trying to find out the same. Was not sure if PAX was P.A.X. or just Pax. I can find no reference to it being short for something, so I am guessing it's simply just "Pax". Sorry, still getting used to adding and editing. --The Fish 01:37, 30 December 2009 (UTC)
- No prob, just means the article has to be moved to "Pax", and this one made into a redirect. Of course, before we do that, we should try to find out the origin of Pax though. :3 Sera404 02:54, 30 December 2009 (UTC)