Talk:Training Enhancement Costs: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
imported>StarGeek |
imported>Sleepykitty No edit summary |
||
| Line 12: | Line 12: | ||
Bah, back to the drawing board. It turns out that default parameters which I planned on using are only in MediaWiki 1.6, which is in alpha or something. --[[User:StarGeek|StarGeek]] 15:53, 23 March 2006 (PST) | Bah, back to the drawing board. It turns out that default parameters which I planned on using are only in MediaWiki 1.6, which is in alpha or something. --[[User:StarGeek|StarGeek]] 15:53, 23 March 2006 (PST) | ||
@.@ I blinked at it again and again but.. what are the darker rows suppost to represent? also, the trainers sell 5, 10, and 15 lvl training enhacements, not just lvlv 5s, and accurecy is listed twice. I'd fix it, but I'm afraid of messing up the table. --[[User:Sleepykitty|Sleepy Kitty]] 15:04, 29 May 2006 (PDT) | |||
Revision as of 22:04, 29 May 2006
Under construction
ATM, I'm just trying to get a feel for how it will look. This name will probably not be the final name.
To Do:
- Centering the numbers, probably make up a template for the cells to allow global changes. I'm not using a single template for the entire line in order to allow flexiblility between the 10 different charts (3 levels of TO pricing, 3 levels of SO pricing, and 4 levels of DO pricing) that'll be in use.
- Different background color for the power ten enhancements, since there are still contacts who only sell power ten. This option is going to be in the template and will be the default.
- Templates to make easy linking to these pages
Any other comments or ideas? --StarGeek 14:28, 23 March 2006 (PST)
Bah, back to the drawing board. It turns out that default parameters which I planned on using are only in MediaWiki 1.6, which is in alpha or something. --StarGeek 15:53, 23 March 2006 (PST)
@.@ I blinked at it again and again but.. what are the darker rows suppost to represent? also, the trainers sell 5, 10, and 15 lvl training enhacements, not just lvlv 5s, and accurecy is listed twice. I'd fix it, but I'm afraid of messing up the table. --Sleepy Kitty 15:04, 29 May 2006 (PDT)