Template talk:WikiAnniversary: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
imported>Felderburg (Created page with "==Qualifications?== Not sure where else to put this discussion. I found a user (User:Sentack) who made 3 edits in the 2nd year badge timeframe, but does not have the badg...") |
imported>Blondeshell |
||
Line 2: | Line 2: | ||
Not sure where else to put this discussion. I found a user ([[User:Sentack]]) who made 3 edits in the 2nd year badge timeframe, but does not have the badge. However, the edits were to a talk page and his own page ([[Special:Contributions/Sentack]]) and the account is not registered. While it's a few years late, if edits to talk pages (especially those that resulted in changes to the article proper) qualify for the badge, even for unregistered users, this user should get the badge. It's a small thing, but there may be other users like Sentack that fell through the cracks that should get recognition for their edits. [[User:Felderburg|Felderburg]] ([[User talk:Felderburg|talk]]) 16:12, 29 May 2015 (UTC) | Not sure where else to put this discussion. I found a user ([[User:Sentack]]) who made 3 edits in the 2nd year badge timeframe, but does not have the badge. However, the edits were to a talk page and his own page ([[Special:Contributions/Sentack]]) and the account is not registered. While it's a few years late, if edits to talk pages (especially those that resulted in changes to the article proper) qualify for the badge, even for unregistered users, this user should get the badge. It's a small thing, but there may be other users like Sentack that fell through the cracks that should get recognition for their edits. [[User:Felderburg|Felderburg]] ([[User talk:Felderburg|talk]]) 16:12, 29 May 2015 (UTC) | ||
:I believe the issue is not whether the edits were worthy, but if they could be found at all. It appears that [[User:Sentack|Sentack]] was converted to [[User:Fiery Transfer|Fiery Transfer]], which caused the edits by Sentack to no longer be searchable. There were several other cases of this that I'd found when I first applied this template, so I'm not surprised that there are more out there. The bigger question is if it's possible to search for all unregistered users and the edits they made. {{User:Blondeshell/Sig}} 16:31, 29 May 2015 (UTC) |
Revision as of 16:31, 29 May 2015
Qualifications?
Not sure where else to put this discussion. I found a user (User:Sentack) who made 3 edits in the 2nd year badge timeframe, but does not have the badge. However, the edits were to a talk page and his own page (Special:Contributions/Sentack) and the account is not registered. While it's a few years late, if edits to talk pages (especially those that resulted in changes to the article proper) qualify for the badge, even for unregistered users, this user should get the badge. It's a small thing, but there may be other users like Sentack that fell through the cracks that should get recognition for their edits. Felderburg (talk) 16:12, 29 May 2015 (UTC)
- I believe the issue is not whether the edits were worthy, but if they could be found at all. It appears that Sentack was converted to Fiery Transfer, which caused the edits by Sentack to no longer be searchable. There were several other cases of this that I'd found when I first applied this template, so I'm not surprised that there are more out there. The bigger question is if it's possible to search for all unregistered users and the edits they made. User:Blondeshell/Sig 16:31, 29 May 2015 (UTC)