Talk:Empowered Sigil Salvage: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
imported>Sleepykitty No edit summary |
imported>Kalon mNo edit summary |
||
| Line 8: | Line 8: | ||
: o.o yeah, its best not to have that sort of info on it, particularly as the price you grabbed was at the low point of the day. @.@ to really have this sort of section, we'd need a info feed from the auction server to patch into. --[[User:Sleepykitty|Sleepy Kitty]] 00:57, 3 July 2007 (EDT) | : o.o yeah, its best not to have that sort of info on it, particularly as the price you grabbed was at the low point of the day. @.@ to really have this sort of section, we'd need a info feed from the auction server to patch into. --[[User:Sleepykitty|Sleepy Kitty]] 00:57, 3 July 2007 (EDT) | ||
:: An info feed on [[WW]]/[[BM]] prices? I'd love that! We need to petition the Devs to set up an RSS feed and let us code a tracker... Oh, wati... I'm getting ahead of my self again. Nice idea, never going to happen. [[User:Kalon|Kalon]] 01:03, 3 July 2007 (EDT) | |||
Latest revision as of 05:03, 3 July 2007
I...
... don't like what I've done. Putting a date-stamped trivial value on a "permanent" page will only cause either:
- a) the constant updating of the values, with no requirement for cross-checking ar regular updates, or
- b) quickly become out-of-date
I originally put this in here so people could get a rough gauge of the price they could pay, but now realise it can cause more trouble than it is worth. I'd value any input as to keeping/deleting the section entirely - I'm prepared to fo it... Kalon 23:54, 2 July 2007 (EDT)
- o.o yeah, its best not to have that sort of info on it, particularly as the price you grabbed was at the low point of the day. @.@ to really have this sort of section, we'd need a info feed from the auction server to patch into. --Sleepy Kitty 00:57, 3 July 2007 (EDT)