Talk:Soft Loading: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
imported>Sekoia No edit summary |
imported>Snorii mNo edit summary |
||
| Line 2: | Line 2: | ||
: The {{tl|delete}} template nominates an article for deletion. Where were you trying to find the nomination for deletion process? If there's someplace we can add info that'd make it easier, it'd certainly be worth doing. :) I'm not deleting this quite yet just in case anyone wants to comment on it. I'd be content to leave it up with the historic tag; I'd also be fine with it going away. I'll try to check back in a week or so to delete it, if nobody objects. -- [[User:Sekoia|Sekoia]] 00:42, 24 April 2008 (UTC) | : The {{tl|delete}} template nominates an article for deletion. Where were you trying to find the nomination for deletion process? If there's someplace we can add info that'd make it easier, it'd certainly be worth doing. :) I'm not deleting this quite yet just in case anyone wants to comment on it. I'd be content to leave it up with the historic tag; I'd also be fine with it going away. I'll try to check back in a week or so to delete it, if nobody objects. -- [[User:Sekoia|Sekoia]] 00:42, 24 April 2008 (UTC) | ||
::I don't see any reason to delete it. It still serves a purpose in informing people what soft loading was and how it was used. Probably just needs to be rewritten to put it in a past tense, etc. My two influence. - [[User:Snorii|Snorii]] 00:46, 24 April 2008 (UTC) | |||
Revision as of 00:46, 24 April 2008
This article is obsolete after 2008-03-05. Also, I don't think there is any reason to keep it around, as it serves little to no historical purpose. I can't seem to find a way to nominate it for deletion, so I'm hoping this will do. Perhaps nomination for deletion should be implemented, or a least explained a little better, Please? -PsychoBit 00:28, 24 April 2008 (UTC)
- The {{delete}} template nominates an article for deletion. Where were you trying to find the nomination for deletion process? If there's someplace we can add info that'd make it easier, it'd certainly be worth doing. :) I'm not deleting this quite yet just in case anyone wants to comment on it. I'd be content to leave it up with the historic tag; I'd also be fine with it going away. I'll try to check back in a week or so to delete it, if nobody objects. -- Sekoia 00:42, 24 April 2008 (UTC)
- I don't see any reason to delete it. It still serves a purpose in informing people what soft loading was and how it was used. Probably just needs to be rewritten to put it in a past tense, etc. My two influence. - Snorii 00:46, 24 April 2008 (UTC)