Homecoming Wiki talk:Main Discussion: Difference between revisions

From Unofficial Homecoming Wiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search
imported>TonyV
mNo edit summary
 
imported>StarGeek
No edit summary
Line 27: Line 27:


-- [[User:TonyV|TonyV]] 16:11, 27 Jan 2006 (CST)
-- [[User:TonyV|TonyV]] 16:11, 27 Jan 2006 (CST)
:Well, Tony already knows my views, but I'll repeat them here :D  I am not a fan of "Other " or "Misc".  My favorite format so far is to make a sublevel only if it's needed for that type of entry.  I tried out a bunch of things when making the Coucil page, and things are going to be just as bad when it comes to Crey, Nemesis, Rikti, Freakshow, etc (oh, man, I just remembered Prisoners, lots of types there that are just some proper name!).  A lot of small variations, and also singular types.  Tsoo for example, lots of enforcers, yellow ink men, red ink men, but only one type of green ink men.  And Lieuts and bosses usually are singular.
:I don't think there's a simple way to work through it. The data set we're working with is just too messy :D  I think there should be 2 formats, a simple one for the small groups with just singular types, and a more complex one for the messy groups (Council, Tsoo, Crey, etc).
: --[[User:StarGeek|StarGeek]] 17:31, 27 Jan 2006 (CST)

Revision as of 23:31, 27 January 2006

A few thoughts about stuff I'm conflicted about

Okay, I freely admit that I'm really stumped about a couple of things, especially about how I want them to appear in the wiki.

First up would have to be the Villain Group articles. I just can't make up my mind how I want them presented. Right now, I'm torn between three options. From an outline view, here they are:

Overview
Minions
- Villain Class
- - Villain Name
- - Villain Name
- - ...
Lieutenants
- Villain Class
- - Villain Name
- - Villain Name
- - ...
...

A Villain Class is a subset of villains within a villain group. For example, the Circle of Thorns has several villain classes: guardians, demons, hordelings, mages, specters, possesseds, and probably several others I'm leaving out. The Council is another villain group with subclasses, such as Penumbrae, Penumbrae Elite, Vortex Cors, Equinoxes, Galaxies, etc.

However, this presents a problem. Where do you put enemies that have no subclass? For example, the Council Ascendants have no subclass. If this standard is adopted, then you'll have to either create a category just for one villain type or lump them all under an "Other" category. (Any other ideas?)

Also, some villain groups don't have subclasses. For example, the Clockwork aren't really neatly divisible like that. There aren't different classes of cogs, sprockets, and oscillators. Some really small villain groups such as The Infected just have five or so different villain types. How will they be formatted?

Consider this an open call for ideas. Either post a reply here or e-mail me at tonyv@pcfreepress.com with your comments.

-- TonyV 16:11, 27 Jan 2006 (CST)

Well, Tony already knows my views, but I'll repeat them here :D I am not a fan of "Other " or "Misc". My favorite format so far is to make a sublevel only if it's needed for that type of entry. I tried out a bunch of things when making the Coucil page, and things are going to be just as bad when it comes to Crey, Nemesis, Rikti, Freakshow, etc (oh, man, I just remembered Prisoners, lots of types there that are just some proper name!). A lot of small variations, and also singular types. Tsoo for example, lots of enforcers, yellow ink men, red ink men, but only one type of green ink men. And Lieuts and bosses usually are singular.
I don't think there's a simple way to work through it. The data set we're working with is just too messy :D I think there should be 2 formats, a simple one for the small groups with just singular types, and a more complex one for the messy groups (Council, Tsoo, Crey, etc).
--StarGeek 17:31, 27 Jan 2006 (CST)