Template talk:Bindcommand: Difference between revisions

From Unofficial Homecoming Wiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search
imported>Konoko
(New page: Perhaps {{tl|slashcommand}} and {{tl|bindcommand}} should be joined. As bindcommand says, all that's missing is the "/". But at the same time, adding 'programming' with #if: or #switch: ...)
 
imported>Eabrace
mNo edit summary
 
Line 2: Line 2:


But at the same time, adding 'programming' with #if: or #switch: or whatever may be excessive. There's nothing wrong with specialization. (says the noko-of-all-trades) --[[User:Konoko|Konoko]] 14:00, 2 August 2007 (EDT)
But at the same time, adding 'programming' with #if: or #switch: or whatever may be excessive. There's nothing wrong with specialization. (says the noko-of-all-trades) --[[User:Konoko|Konoko]] 14:00, 2 August 2007 (EDT)
:When I created this, I'd thought about altering the slashcommand template to just this:
::<nowiki>/{{bindcommand|{{{1}}}|{{{2}}}}}</nowiki>
:That would allow us to only have to change one to update both.  I just needed a way to demostrate the commands without the slashes for bindings and went the quick and dirty route, though. --[[User:Eabrace|Eabrace]] 14:34, 2 August 2007 (EDT)

Latest revision as of 18:34, 2 August 2007

Perhaps {{slashcommand}} and {{bindcommand}} should be joined. As bindcommand says, all that's missing is the "/".

But at the same time, adding 'programming' with #if: or #switch: or whatever may be excessive. There's nothing wrong with specialization. (says the noko-of-all-trades) --Konoko 14:00, 2 August 2007 (EDT)

When I created this, I'd thought about altering the slashcommand template to just this:
/{{bindcommand|{{{1}}}|{{{2}}}}}
That would allow us to only have to change one to update both. I just needed a way to demostrate the commands without the slashes for bindings and went the quick and dirty route, though. --Eabrace 14:34, 2 August 2007 (EDT)