Template talk:Bindcommand: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
imported>Konoko (New page: Perhaps {{tl|slashcommand}} and {{tl|bindcommand}} should be joined. As bindcommand says, all that's missing is the "/". But at the same time, adding 'programming' with #if: or #switch: ...) |
imported>Eabrace mNo edit summary |
||
| Line 2: | Line 2: | ||
But at the same time, adding 'programming' with #if: or #switch: or whatever may be excessive. There's nothing wrong with specialization. (says the noko-of-all-trades) --[[User:Konoko|Konoko]] 14:00, 2 August 2007 (EDT) | But at the same time, adding 'programming' with #if: or #switch: or whatever may be excessive. There's nothing wrong with specialization. (says the noko-of-all-trades) --[[User:Konoko|Konoko]] 14:00, 2 August 2007 (EDT) | ||
:When I created this, I'd thought about altering the slashcommand template to just this: | |||
::<nowiki>/{{bindcommand|{{{1}}}|{{{2}}}}}</nowiki> | |||
:That would allow us to only have to change one to update both. I just needed a way to demostrate the commands without the slashes for bindings and went the quick and dirty route, though. --[[User:Eabrace|Eabrace]] 14:34, 2 August 2007 (EDT) | |||
Latest revision as of 18:34, 2 August 2007
Perhaps {{slashcommand}} and {{bindcommand}} should be joined. As bindcommand says, all that's missing is the "/".
But at the same time, adding 'programming' with #if: or #switch: or whatever may be excessive. There's nothing wrong with specialization. (says the noko-of-all-trades) --Konoko 14:00, 2 August 2007 (EDT)
- When I created this, I'd thought about altering the slashcommand template to just this:
- /{{bindcommand|{{{1}}}|{{{2}}}}}
- That would allow us to only have to change one to update both. I just needed a way to demostrate the commands without the slashes for bindings and went the quick and dirty route, though. --Eabrace 14:34, 2 August 2007 (EDT)