Template talk:IAbility: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
imported>Sekoia No edit summary |
imported>Aggelakis No edit summary |
||
| Line 4: | Line 4: | ||
::: The DPL template for this {{tl|IAbility.dpl}} is still coded to require the second parameter, specifying how many. Is there any reason we can't remove that logic? Since many template calls don't provide the count, it's breaking DPL. -- [[User:Sekoia|Sekoia]] 20:01, 27 December 2011 (UTC) | ::: The DPL template for this {{tl|IAbility.dpl}} is still coded to require the second parameter, specifying how many. Is there any reason we can't remove that logic? Since many template calls don't provide the count, it's breaking DPL. -- [[User:Sekoia|Sekoia]] 20:01, 27 December 2011 (UTC) | ||
::::I am all for removing the extra parameter, due to the reasons FW said to begin with. You can't have more than one at a time, so there's no need to require a number. It will always be 1. ~ {{:User:Aggelakis/Sig1}} 20:13, 27 December 2011 (UTC) | |||
Revision as of 20:13, 27 December 2011
Is there really any need for making this template pluralized? You can't have more than one of the same ability at any given time, so none of the recipes for higher Incarnate abilites require more than one of the same ability. FW (talk · contrib) 05:48, 5 May 2011 (UTC)
- Probably not. I don't think we'd really given it that much thought when the template was originally created, though.--Eabrace
05:53, 5 May 2011 (UTC) - I went ahead and removed the quantity parameter from the template and the pluralization. (And, as it turns out, there was no IAbilityPlural template to remove.)--Eabrace 05:57, 5 May 2011 (UTC)
- The DPL template for this {{IAbility.dpl}} is still coded to require the second parameter, specifying how many. Is there any reason we can't remove that logic? Since many template calls don't provide the count, it's breaking DPL. -- Sekoia 20:01, 27 December 2011 (UTC)
- I am all for removing the extra parameter, due to the reasons FW said to begin with. You can't have more than one at a time, so there's no need to require a number. It will always be 1. ~ User:Aggelakis/Sig1 20:13, 27 December 2011 (UTC)