Template talk:Navbox Incarnate Slots: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
imported>Thirty7 (moved to actual page) |
imported>Aggelakis |
||
| Line 4: | Line 4: | ||
== Future Abilities == | == Future Abilities == | ||
Any reason we can't include the Abilities that have yet to be released in the interface? Genesis, Mind, Vitae and Omega? To my mind at least, there is no harm in including them for sake of completeness (since they are visible on Live) and just not linking to anything... yet (not red-links, mind, but black un-linked text). —[[User:Thirty7|Thirty7]] [[File:Talk-Icon.jpg|link=User talk:Thirty7]] 00:49, 14 May 2012 (UTC) | Any reason we can't include the Abilities that have yet to be released in the interface? Genesis, Mind, Vitae and Omega? To my mind at least, there is no harm in including them for sake of completeness (since they are visible on Live) and just not linking to anything... yet (not red-links, mind, but black un-linked text). —[[User:Thirty7|Thirty7]] [[File:Talk-Icon.jpg|link=User talk:Thirty7]] 00:49, 14 May 2012 (UTC) | ||
:Good idea. Makes it easy to remember to update this template if they don't link anywhere. lol ~ {{:User:Aggelakis/Sig1}} 00:56, 14 May 2012 (UTC) | |||
Revision as of 00:56, 14 May 2012
Good Idea
Might I just say that this is a brilliant idea... something I shoulda thought about before. :) —Thirty7 
22:56, 30 April 2012 (UTC)
Future Abilities
Any reason we can't include the Abilities that have yet to be released in the interface? Genesis, Mind, Vitae and Omega? To my mind at least, there is no harm in including them for sake of completeness (since they are visible on Live) and just not linking to anything... yet (not red-links, mind, but black un-linked text). —Thirty7 00:49, 14 May 2012 (UTC)
- Good idea. Makes it easy to remember to update this template if they don't link anywhere. lol ~ User:Aggelakis/Sig1 00:56, 14 May 2012 (UTC)