Category talk:Player Guide Templates: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
imported>Zombie Man No edit summary |
imported>Aggelakis No edit summary |
||
| Line 2: | Line 2: | ||
:Sorry about that. I saw that there was a category with just one member, which sort of defeats the purpose of using categories. Are there more Player Guides Templates that are expected to be made? Last time I brought up standardizing Player Guides on the forums, the discussion didn't go far. [[User:Zombie Man|Zombie Man]] 12:25, 17 February 2010 (UTC) | :Sorry about that. I saw that there was a category with just one member, which sort of defeats the purpose of using categories. Are there more Player Guides Templates that are expected to be made? Last time I brought up standardizing Player Guides on the forums, the discussion didn't go far. [[User:Zombie Man|Zombie Man]] 12:25, 17 February 2010 (UTC) | ||
::This is not for "Player Guides" templates...this is specifically for "The Players' Guide to the Cities" templates. Difference. I think there might be some other TPGttC templates that are uncategorized, in [[User:Eabrace|Eabrace]]'s userspace. Not sure, though. ~ {{:User:Aggelakis/Sig1}} 14:27, 17 February 2010 (UTC) | |||
Revision as of 14:27, 17 February 2010
Please do not blank this category, or move templates within it, as it is a space to bring The Players' Guide to the Cities templates together. ~ User:Aggelakis/Sig1 04:20, 17 February 2010 (UTC)
- Sorry about that. I saw that there was a category with just one member, which sort of defeats the purpose of using categories. Are there more Player Guides Templates that are expected to be made? Last time I brought up standardizing Player Guides on the forums, the discussion didn't go far. Zombie Man 12:25, 17 February 2010 (UTC)
- This is not for "Player Guides" templates...this is specifically for "The Players' Guide to the Cities" templates. Difference. I think there might be some other TPGttC templates that are uncategorized, in Eabrace's userspace. Not sure, though. ~ User:Aggelakis/Sig1 14:27, 17 February 2010 (UTC)