Talk:Experience: Difference between revisions
imported>CmdrAdeon |
imported>Eabrace m (→Historical) |
||
Line 597: | Line 597: | ||
:::Primarily the parts on distribution on teams I think. In a [http://boards.cityofheroes.com/showpost.php?p=2142802&postcount=29 forum discussion] someone ran a few quick tests in the AE which pretty clearly demonstrate that those rules are wrong. I think that the single player XP values are correct since I was doing some solo play last night and the values I was getting for even level enemies seemed to match. [[User:CmdrAdeon|CmdrAdeon]] 16:37, 20 August 2009 (UTC) | :::Primarily the parts on distribution on teams I think. In a [http://boards.cityofheroes.com/showpost.php?p=2142802&postcount=29 forum discussion] someone ran a few quick tests in the AE which pretty clearly demonstrate that those rules are wrong. I think that the single player XP values are correct since I was doing some solo play last night and the values I was getting for even level enemies seemed to match. [[User:CmdrAdeon|CmdrAdeon]] 16:37, 20 August 2009 (UTC) | ||
::::Interesting. That may actually be a bug. The tweak the devs made to the system some time ago (I'd have to mine the patch notes to see when) was supposed to set a hard limit on the XP at the value for +5. Doesn't look like the system is currently working as intended based on the numbers in that thread. --[[User:Eabrace|Eabrace]] [[File:Healthbar notify phone.png|20px|link=User talk:Eabrace]] 20:30, 20 August 2009 (UTC) |
Revision as of 20:30, 20 August 2009
If you stop getting xp at the max limit, meaning if you have 5xp left to level, and you kill something worth 6xp, you are awarded only 5xp regardless... then level 40 takes a cumulative xp of 8,401,519. I don't want to put this into the table yet because I wasn't sure if it worked that way. Martavius 15:06, 27 May 2006 (PDT)
Level 46
It doesn't fit with the rest of the chart, but I'm looking at what is needed for me to hit level 46. I currently have 22,318,463 and need 63,656 to hit level 46. - Snorii 20:13, 13 July 2006 (PDT)
Not sure where those other numbers came from, but yours add up. Found an xp table! -- Taxibot Yellow 01:46, 23 July 2006 (PDT)
Minor discrepancies
Interestingly (for some...) at level 11 and 39, the XP rewards for Minions and Lieutenants seem to be swapped. Can we confirm if these points are valid? It may have been a simple data-entry problem?
Of course, AVs are by far the best kills/level gained (only ever requiring a maximum of 37.4 even after level 39) whereas the closer to level 50 you are, the less beneficial defeating GMs becomes, closely approaching the same required number of missions after level 39 (plateaus at 167 complete missions for a whole level at level 39) rising fairly smoothly from 65 GMs at level 39 to 150 at level 49.
- Gah! Looked at the wrong trend line on my graph! Missions, not bosses (you need 689 bosses at level 39+ - ouch!) -- Kalon 20:49, 12 August 2007 (EDT)
Old table Archive
These are the base experience reward values for each rank and level of critter, as well as missions. Some of the more difficult critters have a bonus modifier that increases the amount of XP rewarded.
Level | Underling | Minion | Lieut. | Boss | AV/Hero | GM | Mission |
1 | 0 | 10 | 22 | 44 | 1074 | 5 | 10 |
2 | 0 | 10 | 22 | 44 | 1074 | 8 | 25 |
3 | 0 | 10 | 22 | 44 | 1074 | 15 | 25 |
4 | 0 | 10 | 22 | 44 | 1074 | 21 | 33 |
5 | 0 | 11 | 24 | 48 | 1170 | 67 | 50 |
6 | 0 | 12 | 26 | 52 | 1292 | 116 | 50 |
7 | 0 | 13 | 28 | 56 | 1388 | 160 | 75 |
8 | 0 | 14 | 30 | 60 | 1504 | 247 | 81 |
9 | 1 | 15 | 33 | 66 | 1600 | 315 | 112 |
10 | 1 | 16 | 35 | 70 | 1722 | 390 | 100 |
11 | 1 | 17 | 37 | 74 | 1818 | 535 | 130 |
12 | 1 | 18 | 39 | 78 | 1936 | 625 | 140 |
13 | 1 | 20 | 44 | 88 | 2154 | 720 | 171 |
14 | 1 | 22 | 48 | 96 | 2366 | 1000 | 250 |
15 | 1 | 24 | 52 | 104 | 2584 | 1281 | 375 |
16 | 2 | 26 | 57 | 114 | 2798 | 1480 | 500 |
17 | 2 | 29 | 63 | 126 | 3132 | 1818 | 625 |
18 | 2 | 32 | 70 | 140 | 3446 | 2236 | 750 |
19 | 2 | 36 | 79 | 158 | 3878 | 2600 | 875 |
20 | 3 | 40 | 88 | 176 | 4308 | 3190 | 1000 |
21 | 3 | 45 | 99 | 198 | 4856 | 3840 | 1125 |
22 | 4 | 52 | 114 | 228 | 5410 | 4680 | 1250 |
23 | 5 | 60 | 132 | 264 | 6054 | 5600 | 1400 |
24 | 6 | 69 | 151 | 302 | 6798 | 7200 | 1575 |
25 | 7 | 80 | 176 | 352 | 7660 | 9000 | 1775 |
26 | 8 | 92 | 202 | 404 | 8638 | 10000 | 2000 |
27 | 10 | 106 | 233 | 466 | 9718 | 11000 | 2250 |
28 | 11 | 122 | 268 | 536 | 10916 | 12000 | 2525 |
29 | 13 | 141 | 310 | 620 | 12208 | 13000 | 2825 |
30 | 14 | 162 | 356 | 712 | 13740 | 14000 | 3175 |
31 | 16 | 185 | 407 | 814 | 15464 | 15000 | 3575 |
32 | 19 | 211 | 464 | 928 | 17400 | 16000 | 4025 |
33 | 20 | 240 | 528 | 1056 | 19582 | 17000 | 4525 |
34 | 23 | 272 | 598 | 1196 | 22072 | 18000 | 5100 |
35 | 26 | 307 | 675 | 1350 | 24870 | 19000 | 5750 |
36 | 31 | 346 | 761 | 1522 | 28008 | 20000 | 6475 |
37 | 34 | 390 | 858 | 1716 | 31574 | 21000 | 7300 |
38 | 38 | 439 | 965 | 1930 | 35596 | 22000 | 8225 |
39 | 44 | 495 | 1089 | 2178 | 40122 | 23000 | 9275 |
40 | 49 | 558 | 1227 | 2454 | 45220 | 24000 | 10450 |
41 | 52 | 629 | 1383 | 2766 | 50944 | 25000 | 11775 |
42 | 58 | 709 | 1559 | 3118 | 57456 | 26000 | 13275 |
43 | 62 | 799 | 1757 | 3514 | 64684 | 27000 | 14950 |
44 | 65 | 901 | 1982 | 3964 | 72920 | 28000 | 16850 |
45 | 71 | 1016 | 2235 | 4470 | 82230 | 29000 | 19000 |
46 | 76 | 1146 | 2521 | 5042 | 92716 | 30000 | 21425 |
47 | 79 | 1292 | 2842 | 5684 | 104522 | 31000 | 24150 |
48 | 85 | 1457 | 3205 | 6410 | 117832 | 32000 | 27225 |
49 | 89 | 1643 | 3614 | 7228 | 132866 | 33000 | 30700 |
50 | 92 | 1853 | 4076 | 8152 | 149864 | 34000 | 34625 |
51 | 92 | 2090 | 4598 | 9196 | 169016 | 35000 | 34626 |
52 | 92 | 2357 | 5185 | 10370 | 190534 | 36000 | 34627 |
53 | 92 | 2658 | 5847 | 11694 | 214884 | 37000 | 34628 |
54 | 92 | 2998 | 6595 | 13190 | 242368 | 38000 | 34629 |
55 | 92 | 3381 | 7438 | 14876 | 242368 | 39000 | 34630 |
Archiving the current table in easy to read format. The new data I have doesn't have AV GM etc. Catwhoorg 21:36, 16 July 2008 (UTC)
XP per level
This is wrong. I did tests (level 35 character, level 33-38 in bricks on Medics, and 35+39-41 in the RWZ on Rikti infantry and guardians.)
My numbers are:
Critter's Relative Level | XP Multiplier |
-2 | 0.44 |
-1 | 0.55 |
0 | 1 |
+1 | 1.35 |
+2 | 1.78 |
+3 | 2.53 |
+4 or higher | 3.2 |
Here's the old table:
Critter's Relative Level | XP Multiplier |
-5 or lower | 0 |
-4 | 0.2 |
-3 | 0.4 |
-2 | 0.6 |
-1 | 0.8 |
0 | 1 |
+1 | 1.2 |
+2 | 1.4 |
+3 | 1.65 |
+4 | 1.9 |
+5 or higher | 2 |
I will not put these changes into the real thing until someone checks them. Fulmens 16:09, 22 September 2008 (UTC)
- Update- still under discussion on forums. Argument is that my percentages are "of the XP for a level 35 opponent" rather than being "of the XP for the appropriate level enemy"- so a 39 (+4 to me) would be the XP for a 39, times 1.9.
- With a L35 character, I got the same XP for a level 39, 40 and 41 enemy; 1694. That looks like 2.13 times the level 39 enemy's XP.
Fulmens 04:44, 23 September 2008 (UTC)
Historical
This came up on the forums, someone ran a few tests that demonstrated that the information here is clearly not the case. I've tagged it as historical since I can't think of anything better to tag it with. CmdrAdeon 05:54, 20 August 2009 (UTC)
- I removed the historical tag. Instead, we should work toward making the information correct. User:Aggelakis/Sig1 07:01, 20 August 2009 (UTC)
- Which parts need to be updated? --Eabrace 14:20, 20 August 2009 (UTC)
- Primarily the parts on distribution on teams I think. In a forum discussion someone ran a few quick tests in the AE which pretty clearly demonstrate that those rules are wrong. I think that the single player XP values are correct since I was doing some solo play last night and the values I was getting for even level enemies seemed to match. CmdrAdeon 16:37, 20 August 2009 (UTC)
- Interesting. That may actually be a bug. The tweak the devs made to the system some time ago (I'd have to mine the patch notes to see when) was supposed to set a hard limit on the XP at the value for +5. Doesn't look like the system is currently working as intended based on the numbers in that thread. --Eabrace 20:30, 20 August 2009 (UTC)