Talk:Exemplar Effects on Enhancements

Per an Iakona Board post

Level	Set 1	Set 2	Set 3	Set 4
1	0.05	0.022	0.3467	1
2	0.05	0.045	0.3467	1
3	0.05	0.068	0.3467	1
4	0.05	0.092	0.3467	1
5	0.05	0.116	0.3467	1
6	0.05	0.141	0.3467	1
7	0.05	0.166	0.3467	1
8	0.05	0.192	0.3467	1
9	0.05	0.219	0.3467	1
10	0.05	0.246	0.3467	1

11	0.1	0.274	0.3467	1
12	0.1	0.302	0.3467	1
13	0.1	0.331	0.3467	1
14	0.1	0.361	0.3467	1
15	0.1	0.391	0.3467	1
16	0.1	0.422	0.3467	1
17	0.1	0.454	0.3467	1
18	0.1	0.486	0.3467	1
19	0.1	0.519	0.3467	1
20	0.1	0.553	0.3467	1

21	0.2	0.587	0.3467	1
22	0.2	0.623	0.3467	1
23	0.2	0.659	0.3467	1
24	0.2	0.696	0.3467	1
25	0.2	0.733	0.3467	1
26	0.2	0.772	0.3467	1
27	0.2	0.811	0.3467	1
28	0.2	0.852	0.3467	1
29	0.2	0.893	0.3467	1
30	0.2	0.935	0.3467	1

31	0.2	0.978	0.3467	1
32	0.2	1	0.3467	1
33	0.2	1	0.3467	1
34	0.2	1	0.3467	1
35	0.2	1	0.3467	1
36	0.2	1	0.3467	1
37	0.2	1	0.3467	1
38	0.2	1	0.3467	1
39	0.2	1	0.3467	1
40	0.2	1	0.3467	1

41	0.2	1	0.3467	1
42	0.2	1	0.3467	1
43	0.2	1	0.3467	1
44	0.2	1	0.3467	1
45	0.2	1	0.3467	1
46	0.2	1	1	1
47	0.2	1	1	1
48	0.2	1	1	1
49	0.2	1	1	1
50	0.2	1	1	1

Most enhancers are scale 2, with interupts as scale 3. Scale 1 appears to be used by Mako's Quad enhancers (Ongoing thread with post by Electora)

Certainly not 100$% straight forward as the article implies. Catwhoorg 21:34, 7 April 2008 (UTC)

"I figured out what's going on with the interrupt enhancements, though I still have no idea why it works this way. Apparently, when you exemp down to level 1-45, the base value of interrupt SOs is lowered to 34.67% instead of 40%, and then the normal degradation is applied." - Iakona, [1] . (This is in response to [2] and [3] .)

And that's how Scale 3 is used. Except that Scale 3 isn't filled with 0.3467 on lines 1-45 any more, it's filled with 0.4150, although the post where he actually said that got pruned by the Forum Monster. It's unfortunate, because everything I wrote in "Step 1." came from it.

Iakona also said "I'll let you all figure out what these numbers actually mean, as I don't have the time to test it all out right now" when he posted that big table you quoted. Well, we know what Scales 2 and 3 do, and Scale 4 can't do anything. It sounds like Natsuki has a good bead on Scale 1's function. Corebreach 08:13, 8 April 2008 (UTC)

Corebreach, I like that rewrite you did. Flows much better and logically. Catwhoorg 13:01, 14 April 2008 (UTC)