Talk:Weekly Strike Target: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
imported>SpaceNut No edit summary |
imported>Draeth Darkstar |
||
| Line 73: | Line 73: | ||
What do people think? Does it make the table too crowded? [[User:SpaceNut|SpaceNut]] 21:46, 22 March 2011 (UTC) | What do people think? Does it make the table too crowded? [[User:SpaceNut|SpaceNut]] 21:46, 22 March 2011 (UTC) | ||
:I personally feel that a Historical section in ''this'' article with the above table would be the most logically intuitive place and format for this information. A mention should be made in the Task Force article. That said, I'm not sure it would be necessary to display any information other than the Task Force name, the last Weekly Strike Target date, and possibly the badge icon just for visual clarity. [[User:Draeth Darkstar|Draeth Darkstar]] 20:48, 28 March 2011 (UTC) | |||
Revision as of 20:48, 28 March 2011
Abbreviation
Requesting a new abbreviation for Weekly Task Force... honestly I don;t wanna be getting tells like this:
[Tell]averagejoehero:WTF?
Maybe Task Force of the Week (TFW) would be better as a global recommendation for abbreviation. just a thought.Joshex 19:25, 17 February 2011 (UTC)
- Technically, WST is the proper official abbreviation based on the term that was handed to us by the developers. The alternate abbreviations are in frequent use throughout the community, meaning that only the community-at-large really has the power to change that. --Eabrace
19:36, 17 February 2011 (UTC)
Past Strike Targets?
At what point do we start removing "Past Strike Targets"? The list is going to get long pretty quickly if we add another line every week. SpaceNut 16:49, 22 March 2011 (UTC)
- Personally, I think it should be removed immediately. I don't see it holding much historical significance. --GuyPerfect 16:59, 22 March 2011 (UTC)
- The only use I really see the list serving is in the case where someone is asking, "When can I expect my favorite TF to be the WST?" and the answer is, "It already was the WST <X> weeks ago." Perhaps if we want to preserve those dates, it would be better to indicate in an already existing table the last time a given TF was the WST. (Maybe here or in a "Historical" section in the individual TF's main article, for example.) --Eabrace 17:33, 22 March 2011 (UTC)
- The only use I really see the list serving is in the case where someone is asking, "When can I expect my favorite TF to be the WST?" and the answer is, "It already was the WST <X> weeks ago." Perhaps if we want to preserve those dates, it would be better to indicate in an already existing table the last time a given TF was the WST. (Maybe here or in a "Historical" section in the individual TF's main article, for example.) --Eabrace
| Badge Awarded |
Task Force Name | Contact | Min Size |
Level Range | Merits | Missions | WST Date | Notes |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
The Rule of Three | Positron | 3 | 10 to 15 | 11 | 7 | N/A | Accolade requirement for Positron's Ally and Task Force Commander. |
|
Dam Hero | Positron | 3 | 11 to 16 | 15 | 7 | N/A | Accolade requirement for Positron's Ally and Task Force Commander. |
|
The Fall of the Clockwork King | Synapse | 4 | 15 to 20 | 58 | 15 | N/A | Accolade requirement for Task Force Commander. |
|
Clamor and Destruction | Sister Psyche | 5 | 20 to 25 | 50 | 14 | 02/22/11- 02/28/11 |
Accolade requirement for Task Force Commander. |
What do people think? Does it make the table too crowded? SpaceNut 21:46, 22 March 2011 (UTC)
- I personally feel that a Historical section in this article with the above table would be the most logically intuitive place and format for this information. A mention should be made in the Task Force article. That said, I'm not sure it would be necessary to display any information other than the Task Force name, the last Weekly Strike Target date, and possibly the badge icon just for visual clarity. Draeth Darkstar 20:48, 28 March 2011 (UTC)