Template talk:Navbox Issues: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
imported>Aggelakis |
imported>Aggelakis m (→Expanding: wording) |
||
| Line 20: | Line 20: | ||
Do you think it might be worthwhile to replace this template with something like the above (expanded to include all issues/patch notes, though)? It seems like it would be valuable to keep the patch notes and issue releases intertwined for navigation. The only problem with the above approach is that it would only have space for 18 total issues (only 20 groups in the navbox template), though if we need to I can potentially change the navbox template to accommodate more. Maybe there'd be a better approach though than the above. The above might be info overload. I dunno, just musing. -- [[User:Sekoia|Sekoia]] 06:46, 15 December 2008 (UTC) | Do you think it might be worthwhile to replace this template with something like the above (expanded to include all issues/patch notes, though)? It seems like it would be valuable to keep the patch notes and issue releases intertwined for navigation. The only problem with the above approach is that it would only have space for 18 total issues (only 20 groups in the navbox template), though if we need to I can potentially change the navbox template to accommodate more. Maybe there'd be a better approach though than the above. The above might be info overload. I dunno, just musing. -- [[User:Sekoia|Sekoia]] 06:46, 15 December 2008 (UTC) | ||
:Wayyyy too much information for just a section to slap at the bottom of the | :Wayyyy too much information for just a section to slap at the bottom of the "overview" "Issue #" pages. Make a separate template {{tl|Patch Notes}} for the [[Patch Notes/etc]] pages. -- [[User:Aggelakis|Agge]] ([[User_talk:Aggelakis|talk]]) 06:53, 15 December 2008 (UTC) | ||
Revision as of 06:54, 15 December 2008
Expanding
Do you think it might be worthwhile to replace this template with something like the above (expanded to include all issues/patch notes, though)? It seems like it would be valuable to keep the patch notes and issue releases intertwined for navigation. The only problem with the above approach is that it would only have space for 18 total issues (only 20 groups in the navbox template), though if we need to I can potentially change the navbox template to accommodate more. Maybe there'd be a better approach though than the above. The above might be info overload. I dunno, just musing. -- Sekoia 06:46, 15 December 2008 (UTC)
- Wayyyy too much information for just a section to slap at the bottom of the "overview" "Issue #" pages. Make a separate template {{Patch Notes}} for the Patch Notes/etc pages. -- Agge (talk) 06:53, 15 December 2008 (UTC)